Australia's Budget 2026 Matrix

Methodology

CGT & Negative Gearing Matrix

A 120-cell scenario matrix for Australia's Budget 2026 CGT and negative gearing changes, organised by investor archetype, life stage, and policy branch.

Hard borders, compact cards, and scenario-first decision support for a narrow Budget 2026 subset.

Browse the matrix

2×2 archetype grid. Click a dot to open the full cell in the detail panel.

Project update log

Latest project changes and releases for this matrix.

Methodology

How these matrices are constructed, scored, and meant to be read.

1. Matrix shape

The viewer maps four investor archetypes across five life stages and six policy branches, creating 120 cells. Each cell represents one practical position rather than a generic ideological take.

2. Cell design

Every cell is written as an action under a specific scenario. It includes the recommended move, the reasoning, the key assumption, likely regret if the branch resolves differently, and a calculator anchor for deeper modelling.

3. Payoff scoring

Dot colour reflects expected payoff for that exact archetype × life stage × scenario combination, not just the scenario headline. The scale runs from strongly negative through neutral to strongly positive.

4. Policy basis

The matrices are grounded in the Budget 2026 CGT redesign, the residential negative-gearing changes, and the later grace-window correction for property buyers. Where the law or implementation remains uncertain, the cells hedge explicitly instead of pretending certainty.

5. Reader stance

The goal is not to predict the future perfectly. The goal is to show what looks robust, fragile, or timing-sensitive for a given investor profile if one policy branch becomes real.

6. Companion tools

Use this matrix for strategic orientation, then use the CGT calculator for explicit arithmetic and Factual AU for claim-level scrutiny of the surrounding public debate.